Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sillejo's avatar

There could be a roll for copying part of the USTA league formats. It’s not a perfect fit and needs some more trim around it but here is the idea based on USTA “early start” leagues that play in the fall ahead of the season they count against for rankings:

Events after the US Open can choose to be a same-season event or and early-start event for the following year.

Players choosing the early start tourneys apply those points to the next season instead of continuing to fight for current rankings.

They would only get to play early start tourneys every other year.

Early start participants would get a small bonus points bump

Expected benefits:

Existing tourneys don’t have to get cut.

Players can choose to reset instead of grind out the year.

Top Players coming back from injury could benefit from tune-ups that matter but not points they have to defend.

Fans can follow current year tourneys or Next year tourneys at the same time even on the same weeks

Again, none of this is even half baked but the idea of starting the next season sooner might allow those players to take spot time off throughout the next season and decompress their own schedule every other year while still keeping the individual tournament total relatively the same.

Expand full comment
crimx's avatar

Today you asked the question, what specifically needs to change in tennis? What is Novak actually asking for? I suspect he’s thinking about a LIV Tennis arrangement but what he should be advocating for is this:

PLAYER WELFARE & FAIR GROWTH AGENDA — A Vision for a Stronger, Fairer Tennis Tour

Proposed by Novak Djokovic (hypothetical)

1. Smarter Scheduling, Less Burnout, More Opportunity

• Reduce mandatory Masters participation for top 20 players from 9 to 6–7 events.

• Protect player rankings during rest periods.

• Expand main draw spots to give lower-ranked players more access and ranking opportunities.

• Maintain overall tournament volume so the sport grows — even as top players manage their load better.

2. A Transparent Revenue-Sharing Model

• Allocate 55% of total tournament revenue (Slams + Masters + 500s) directly to players.

• Create a clear distribution model:

• 80% performance-based for main draws

• 10% dedicated to lower-ranked player support

• 10% to long-term pension and welfare funds

• Publish annual breakdowns for full transparency.

3. Player Pension & Welfare Fund

• Dedicate 10% of shared revenue to create a portable pension, injury, and insurance system.

• All players with 3+ years on tour receive guaranteed retirement and medical coverage.

• Top players who opt for reduced schedules contribute proportionally more to sustain the system.

4. Premium Events that Power the Ecosystem

• Establish a small number of marquee “premium events” with elevated prize pools and media rights.

• Feature top players selectively to reduce burnout and raise commercial value.

• A fixed % of broadcast revenue from these events goes directly to fund lower-tier prize pools.

5. Stronger Challenger & ITF Pathways

• Guarantee a minimum 10% annual increase in Challenger and ITF prize pools.

• Introduce travel/accommodation stipends for players ranked 100–400.

• Expand ranking opportunities so the pathway to the top remains open and meritocratic.

6. Balanced Governance for a United Sport

• Create a joint Player–Tournament Council with equal seats for:

• Top 20 players

• Players ranked 21–200

• Tournament/ATP representatives.

• Major financial and calendar decisions require cross-block approval, ensuring no single group dominates.

✨ Closing Statement (very hypothetical Novak):

“Tennis is global, open, and built on generations of players — not just the few at the top.

Real player welfare isn’t about creating a closed shop. It’s about making the sport stronger for everyone — stars, challengers, and fans alike.

Let’s build something lasting, for all professional players’

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?